When recommending changes to an existing policy, the officer should first start with:

• A. Popular decisions from their crew
• B. Results from post incident analysis
• C. Making a list of what is wrong
• D. Challenging the authority of the administration

Answer: (B)

Starting with results from post-incident analysis ensures any policy changes are grounded in what actually occurred and why. This analysis examines what happened, identifies root causes, and highlights gaps in procedures, training, equipment, or communication. It provides objective data and a clear basis for prioritizing changes, as well as measurable criteria to evaluate effectiveness after implementation.

Relying on popular decisions from the crew reflects opinions rather than evidence. Simply listing what’s wrong offers a starting point for discussion but lacks the data needed to justify specific changes. Chipping away at the administration’s authority is not a constructive step for policy improvement and can derail a data-driven approach.