Which outcome best aligns with the purpose of a post-incident critique?

• A. Blaming the individuals
• B. Focus on training needs
• C. Publish in local newspaper
• D. Increase insurance

Answer: (B)

Post-incident critiques focus on learning and system improvement so similar events don’t happen again. The best outcome is identifying training needs that address gaps revealed by the incident, and turning those findings into concrete actions—targeted drills, updated procedures, clearer decision-making guidelines, and changes to tactics or equipment use. This approach strengthens the crew’s readiness and reduces the likelihood of recurrence.

Blaming individuals tends to create defensiveness and hides broader issues in how the team operates, which undermines safety improvements. Publishing the incident in a local newspaper isn’t a productive safety action and can erode trust and reporting. Simply increasing insurance addresses financial risk rather than informing changes on the ground.